-
# Still no cure for cancer
According to the findings, couples who engage in sex at least four times a month bring themselves a measure of happiness equal to $71,500 a year compared with couples who have sex only once a month.
I am supposed to have a review today, I will be making it a pay review as well. But now I am worried. If I ask for more money, will they just arrange for me to have more sex? Not more worrying in and of itself, but knowing this company, with its Not Invented Here syndrome, they’d want to keep it in-house, which is just plain disturbing.
This interests economists because they reckon more happiness could lead to a stronger economy by reducing health-care costs and increasing productivity.
ibid
Wouldn’t that be a hell of a come on line though. “Come on baby, let’s do it. For the country.”
Update: Oh shit! I got the raise. No, Ray, no! I don’t think of you that waaaaaayyyyyyy!!!!!!
-
# Re: Still no cure for cancer
Keeping it in-house would be better than having it outsourced to Asia though
-
# Re: Still no cure for cancer
Didn't Costello already say that when he was promoting his budget? By inference, I mean. You know, one for mum, one for dad and one for the country….
-
# Re: Still no cure for cancer
I got a raise a couple weeks ago. I bet I still don't make anything near you.
-
# Re: Still no cure for cancer
I tell you what, I bet with tax, and then HECS, we're a lot closer than you think
-
-
Meta
Feeds
Links
powered by del.icio.us
323 days since 09/09/2009